Reducing use of limited resources effectively
Using resources • Life cycle assessment and recycling
Flashcards
Test your knowledge with interactive flashcards
Key concepts
What you'll likely be quizzed about
Definition of limited resources
Limited resources include metals, fossil fuels, rare minerals and other materials that are finite or slow to replenish. Water and some specific chemical feedstocks can also behave as limited resources under heavy demand. Clear identification of which resources are limited in a product or process forms the basis for targeted reduction measures. Limitations arise from supply, rate of regeneration, geopolitical distribution and environmental cost of extraction. Effective strategies focus on the most constrained resources in a life cycle to achieve the greatest benefit.
Reduce by design and material efficiency
Design choices that use less material cause a direct reduction in resource extraction. Lighter components, thinner layers and optimized shapes reduce mass and therefore material demand. Manufacturing processes that minimize waste, such as precision cutting or additive manufacturing, lower the quantity of raw material required. Limiting factors include structural performance, safety requirements and production tolerances. Redesign often requires initial investment and testing to ensure that reduced material use does not compromise function or increase other environmental impacts.
Substitution with abundant or renewable materials
Substitution replaces a scarce material with one that is more abundant, recyclable or renewable - for example, using aluminum instead of rare metals or biopolymers instead of some fossil-derived plastics. Substitution reduces demand pressure on limited resources and can improve recyclability. Limitations include differences in properties (strength, conductivity, corrosion resistance), cost, availability of supply chains and possible new environmental impacts associated with the substitute material. Substitution requires assessment of performance and life cycle consequences.
Extending product lifetime and reuse
Extending lifetime reduces the rate at which new resources are needed. Durable design, repairability, modular components and maintenance regimes all slow replacement cycles. Reuse of components or whole products avoids extraction and processing of new materials. Barriers include consumer behaviour, economic incentives for replacement, design complexity for repair and regulatory or safety concerns that restrict second-hand use. Effective extension often requires product design that facilitates inspection and repair.
Recycling and closed-loop systems
Recycling recovers material from products at end-of-life and returns it to production, reducing the need for virgin resources. Closed-loop systems aim to keep materials within a product cycle through collection, sorting and reprocessing. Recycling lowers extraction, energy use (often) and landfill. Limitations include collection infrastructure, contamination of waste streams, separation costs, and losses in material quality during recycling. Some materials require energy-intensive recycling or produce lower-grade output that limits reuse options.
Process efficiency and energy reductions
Improving process efficiency reduces resource inputs per unit of product. Examples include lower-temperature processes, catalysts that increase yield, and closed systems that recycle solvents or water. Energy-efficient production reduces demand for fossil fuels and electricity tied to limited energy resources. Practical limits include capital costs for new equipment, thermodynamic constraints, and trade-offs where efficiency gains in one stage increase resource use elsewhere. Realistic evaluation considers whole-process impacts.
Role of life cycle assessment (LCA) in evaluation
Life cycle assessment quantifies environmental impacts across extraction, manufacture, use and disposal stages. LCA compares resource consumption, energy use, emissions and waste for alternative strategies, allowing informed evaluation of trade-offs. Decision-making uses LCA results to prioritise measures that reduce net resource use. Limitations of LCA include uncertainty in data, assumptions made about system boundaries, and difficulty in valuing social or economic factors. LCA results require careful interpretation and sensitivity analysis.
Economic and social limiting factors
Costs, market adoption and regulatory context limit the application of resource-reduction measures. High initial costs or lack of infrastructure obstruct recycling or material substitution. Market demand and supply chains influence whether alternatives scale up. Social factors include consumer acceptance, behaviour and skills for repair. Policy measures, subsidies or standards can change incentives and affect feasibility.
Trade-offs and unintended consequences
Actions that reduce one resource can increase use of another or produce higher emissions. For example, replacing a limited metal with a polymer may lower metal demand but increase fossil fuel use. Increased recycling can require energy-intensive processing. Evaluation requires identification of trade-offs and net effects across the life cycle. Solutions that appear beneficial in isolation require validation by comparing whole-system impacts.
Key notes
Important points to keep in mind