Evaluating the use of chemical and fuel cells
Energy changes • Chemical and fuel cells
Flashcards
Test your knowledge with interactive flashcards
Key concepts
What you'll likely be quizzed about
Types of cells and clear definitions
Primary cells provide a single-use electrochemical reaction and do not recharge. Secondary cells allow reversible reactions and recharge through supplied electrical energy. Fuel cells continuously supply reactants (fuel and oxidant) and sustain electricity generation as long as reactants and catalysts remain available. Definitions distinguish single-use, rechargeable, and continuous-supply systems and set the basis for evaluation. Limiting factors for each type include reactant availability for fuel cells, electrode and electrolyte deterioration for secondary cells, and finite reactants for primary cells. These limiting factors determine practical lifetime, maintenance needs, and suitability for different applications.
Evaluation criteria: efficiency and energy characteristics
Energy efficiency measures useful electrical energy out divided by chemical energy in. Higher efficiency reduces fuel or battery mass for the same energy delivered; therefore high-efficiency cells reduce operating cost and environmental impact. Efficiency depends on reaction overpotentials, internal resistance and cell operating conditions. Energy density (energy per unit mass or volume) determines how long a device runs between refuels or charges; power density (power per unit mass) determines instantaneous power delivery. Cause → effect: higher internal resistance causes lower power density and greater energy lost as heat, which reduces usable output and can accelerate degradation.
Cost, lifetime and rechargeability
Upfront cost includes materials (rare metals, catalysts), manufacturing and system components (control electronics, fuel storage). Operational cost includes fuel, maintenance and replacement. Cause → effect: expensive catalysts and complex systems cause high initial cost and higher replacement cost, which reduces economic viability. Lifetime depends on electrode corrosion, catalyst poisoning and electrolyte breakdown. Rechargeability enables reuse of stored chemical energy; therefore secondary cells save replacement cost but require infrastructure and management of charge cycles. Limiting factors for rechargeability include cycle life (number of effective charge/discharge cycles) and capacity fade.
Environmental impact and safety
Environmental impact depends on raw material extraction, manufacturing emissions, in-use emissions and end-of-life disposal or recycling. Cause → effect: use of toxic or scarce metals increases environmental cost and recycling complexity, which raises lifecycle impact. Fuel cells with hydrogen emit only water at the point of use, but hydrogen production method dictates net environmental effect. Safety considerations include flammability of fuels, leakage of electrolytes, thermal runaway in some rechargeable cells and gas handling risks. Limiting factors for safe deployment include operating temperature ranges, required protective systems and guidelines for transportation and storage.
Practical suitability and application matching
Application requirements determine the preferred cell type. Portable low-drain devices favour primary cells for low cost and long shelf life. Consumer electronics and electric vehicles favour secondary cells for rechargeability and high energy density. Transport and large-scale stationary power favour fuel cells where continuous operation and quick refuelling provide advantages. Cause → effect: where continuous high-power output and rapid refuelling are essential, fuel cells deliver advantage; where light, compact energy storage and existing charging infrastructure suffice, rechargeable cells provide advantage. Limiting factors such as refuelling infrastructure, mass, volume and lifecycle emissions shape final selection.
Key notes
Important points to keep in mind